November 25th, 2012
Take-home assignment
Mr. Garrioch / English Composition
11b4 111150 Ho InHee
Make a rational
argument for a position you do
not support personally. For clarity, please state your
true opinion first and then
argue the opposite position. Consider an issue that has affected you personally.
Argument: Literary works by politicians shouldn’t
appear in national textbooks.
Textbooks, especially national textbooks,
should always remain politically neutral. But the prohibition of publishing
literary works by politicians in textbooks wouldn’t offer political neutrality
to textbooks, and therefore, shouldn’t be passed.
The term ‘literary works by politicians’ is
ambiguous. Depending on the application of the law, the term may refer only to
literatures an incumbent politicians then wrote, or it may refer to any
literatures written in a once politician’s life.
Also, the effectiveness of such law is very
uncertain. Politicians’ literary works often contain no political intention,
and non-politicians’ literary works often contains clear political bias. Thus,
banning publication of literatures by politicians in textbooks has great loophole
and large room for abuse.
The prohibition of publishing literary
works by politicians in textbooks, with its ambiguous standard and uncertain
effectiveness, may only make textbooks a political battlefield.
You wrote two? In some ways this one is better - a bit more smoothly written. However, again, you are a bit shy of the prompt's instruction. The issue is also somewhat complicated and unclear. So you made a good decision to address something less fraught. Anyways, good to see the extra effort.
답글삭제