March 27th, 2013
James Joyce – The Dead Reading Journal
Mr. Garrioch / World Lit
12v1 111150 Ho In Hee
James Joyce chose Dublin as the setting of his fifteen short stories
because the city was, he saw, “the center of paralysis”. In such sense, The Dead, the final chapter of his collection Dubliners, should culminate in the lifelessness and paralysis.
Surprisingly, however, the story is set in a seemingly lively party. Old Aunt
Kate and Aunt Julia throw a magnificent annual dance party with their only niece
Mary Jane. People from diverse classes are invited – from an educated scholar to
a rum-dum. The party is held in a house upper of which they had rented from Mr
Fulham, in Ireland upper of which is ruled by the Great Britain.
Amidst the majority in the party, who drinks, dances, and enjoys,
Gabriel Conroy is a protagonist who thinks he is distinguished from other
Irishmen. He is a college professor and a literary critic living in prosperous
Monkstown with his wife Gretta, unlike Usher’s Islanders. An educated man
himself, Gabriel can make a speech referring to John Milton and write a
literary column with Browning’s poems. He is also a very considerate man who “sometimes [I] fear that this new
generation, educated or hyper-educated as it is, will lack those qualities of
humanity, of hospitality, of kindly humour which belonged to an older day.”
He is a Universalist who prefers to go to France or Belgium or perhaps Germany
than to visit his own land Ireland he is sick of.
Gabriel is a man with strong self-consciousness. When Gabriel asks
her about love, Lily, the caretaker’s daughter, replies with great bitterness that
“the men that is now is only all palaver
and what they can get out of you.” Gabriel colors with embarrassment at her
back answer. Deeply humiliated, he hastily trots to the stairs and wave his
hand to Lily in deprecation after (almost forcefully) handing her some coins for
Christmas tip. Gabriel encounters another disconcertion while dancing with Ms
Ivors, a frank-mannered, talkative young lady. Ms Ivors refers what Gabriel
considers as scholarly acts to unpatriotic. She calls him a West Briton in the
midst of all partiers. Gabriel, frustrated by all the eyes on him, nervously
shouts that he is “[I’m] sick of my own
country!”
Apart from Gabriel’s frustration, the party reaches its full swing as
goose and pudding are served. Aunt Julia sings an old song in her strong and
clear voice, Mary Jane plays her piano, and Gabriel delivers a wise and witty speech.
Guests sings “For they are jolly their
gay fellows” in unison, and the party is over. After the guests leave Ms
Morkan’s, tenor Mr D’Arcy sings The Lass
of Aughrim. Gretta listens hard to this traditional Irish song standing right
under the dusty fanlight. Looking at his absorbed wife, with colour on her
cheeks and her eyes shining Gabriel finds “a
sudden tide of joy going leaping out of his heart.” Gabriel’s desire toward
Gretta mounts when they two reach hotel. Here, “only the stress of his nails against the palms of his hands held the
wild impulse of his body in check” while “[he] could have flung his arms about her hips and held her still, for
his arms were trembling with desire.” Gabriel tries to see some passion or
desire in Gretta’s eyes as well. But against Gabriel’s wish, Gretta remains
abstracted. When Gretta talks to Gabriel about Michael Furey, a guy who got her
mind lost, however, Gabriel finds a shameful consciousness of his own person
assailing him. Gabriel is a man sure of his belief to embrace the present, to “not linger on the past”, as he
addresses in his speech at Ms Morkan’s party. To him, whoever dead is the dead
from the past, while he is the alive living the present. But Gabriel is “humiliated by the failure of his irony and
by the evocation of this figure from the dead, a boy in the gasworks.”
While the dead Michael Furey is remembered by Gretta, Gabriel, facing her in
the very present, is in nowhere in her heart.
Gabriel’s solid belief is challenged. What he thought was dead is
alive and what he thought is alive is actually dead. He notices it is the
foolish people lingering in the past who linger in time. Watching Gretta crying
herself to sleep, Gabriel realizes that it is “better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some
passion, than fade and wither dismally with age.” Generous tears start
filling Gabriel’s eyes, as his soul approaches that region where dwells the
vast hosts of the dead. The revelation of time, as Thomas Aquinas wrote in Summa Theologiae that “priority
and posteriority are discerned, so the cessation of motion puts a stop to
priority and posteriority; and so nothing remains but eternity, which is
simultaneously whole,” illuminates Gabriel’s heart. Untangled from its own stubbornness
and vanity, Gabriel’s mind goes on to accepting what Ms Ivors meant when
calling him a West Briton. By the end of the story, when he says “The time had come for him to set out on his
journey westward”, he finally concedes how he had disregarded people like
Ms Ivors as an ignorant narrow-minded nationalist, how he had neglected his own
country without properly understanding it.
Just like anyone else, I encountered diverse experiences and went
through the break of my belief few times. The latest one of them happened
during the Lunar New Year’s Holiday in February. But it was none of the bitter
experiences or great adversities that brought me to such realization. It was but
my grandmother’s phone call.
I was in my mom’s car when my grandmother called me. I was surprised
to see my grandmother’s number on the screen since she did not call me so
often. So I assumed there was some urgent matter she had to tell me. But
opposed to what I expected, the question she asked me was plain and simple: “Are
you staying in your school during the holidays?” I responded I was staying in
my house. She then added some incoherent comments, like what she ate for dinner
last night and when she is planning to go to church during the holidays. Then
before hanging up the phone, she asked if I could come over to her house and
have a dinner together. I replied yes. And that was the end of our talk.
After getting off the phone, I suddenly reminded what my mom had
told me few days before about my grandmother. She told me that my grandmother
these days barely visited or even called our house unlike before. Since last
year when she was bereaved of my grandfather, my grandmother started visiting
our house very often, sometimes twice a day in Sundays. She called us time to
time without special event and asked us what we were doing. I was raised by my
grandmother since I was little and I was for no reason uncomfortable with her.
But my mother was different. She didn’t feel so comfortable with grandmother in
my house. The general Korean ‘mother-in-law and daughter-in-law’ relationship might
have worked in theirs as well. According to my mom, it is against manner to
rest in bed with the presence of elders in the house or to serve a simple meal.
To me, grandmother wasn’t a kind of person who would be cruel to my mom with
such trifles, but my mom did feel very uncomfortable with my grandmother.
It wasn’t long after my grandfather’s death my mom started to get
irritated with my grandmother’s frequent visits. She answered grandmother’s
call with brusque words and greeted her with a sigh. She complained grandmother
never notices how much my mom feels uncomfortable with her. But now, with
grandmother knowing what my mom feels about her, would my mom feel comfortable
than before?
If Gabriel was a wise man living the present and not dwelling on the
past in his own conceit, I was the honest one in my own. I had long considered
myself as an honest and truthful person who never dissembles. At the same time,
I disliked those who often put a fake smile and feigned kindness. They were, in
my viewpoint, tainted in secular society. But frankness is not always the best.
If my mom made a little more effort to treat my grandmother with kindness, even
if the kindness might be an affected one, no one would have to bear the
awkwardness whenever my mom and grandmother are together. The emotion that is
swirling my mind is not always rational and is better not shown. After all, the
jealousy I might have toward a beautiful and talented girl is never worth being
expressed. What I defined as ‘honesty’ was a convenient excuse to express
whatever is in my mind and never containing it.
That frankness is not always the best choice might not be as
philosophical as Gabriel’s realization of time. It may merely be seen as a ‘socializing’
of me rather than an epiphany. In fact, the immediate feeling the word ‘epiphany’
oozes is somewhat scholarly, as the word is mostly used in literature classes
(especially when discussing eminent yet unkind writer James Joyce). It would be
for similar reason that the word ‘epiphany’ seems very convoluted and profound.
Even James Joyce defined epiphany as somewhat spiritual when he wrote in Stephen Hero, his
autobiographical novel, that “By an
epiphany he meant a sudden spiritual manifestation, whether in the vulgarity of
speech or of gesture or in a memorable phase of the mind itself.”
But the word itself does not exclude anything. What the narrator in
Araby found as an epiphany might be seen as a simple disillusion of an
ingenuous youth. The most crucial thing is, perhaps, readily realizing whatever
an incident may teach. Like Gabriel, who accepted his wrong values of life instead
of simply being furious when his wife got lost in the memories of her first
love, the true realization may occur from the nastiest instances, or even the
most trivial ones.
Some very good, dense, literary toned writing that "summarizes" the story with keen observation. In that regard, this reading journal is very good; but, you overlook the opportunity to personally reflect on your own sense of what "epiphany" is, as instructed. As well, while your summary is very good, and not simply focused on plot or character development (and more so tracing subtext), I would encourage you not to take this route, and instead focus on a particular theme or aspect of the story that you feel is worth discussing. Your conclusion related to Stephen Hero needs some explanation as well.
답글삭제I do like this sentence, which aptly describes Gabriel's new state of mind:
Gabriel’s solid belief is challenged. What he thought was dead is alive and what he thought is alive is actually dead.
Maybe that should have been your thesis? All in all, good work, and perhaps hard work; but is it what was asked for? I would prefer half as much literary summarizing and more of your own voice regarding your opinion.
I just saw your comment now and figured out that I posted the older version (which was not fully finished) on the blog and didn't update it..(And I work on the msword first and then copy paste it) I put the complete one! (though I'm not sure this overdued version would be taken into account, but anyway!) Sorry :(
답글삭제